Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Localized bone regeneration around dental implants using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 and platelet-derived growth factor-BB in the canine.
Thoma, Daniel S; Cha, Jae-Kook; Sapata, Vitor M; Jung, Ronald E; Hüsler, Juerg; Jung, Ui-Won.
Affiliation
  • Thoma DS; Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Cha JK; Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
  • Sapata VM; Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Jung RE; Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hüsler J; Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Jung UW; Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 28(11): 1334-1341, 2017 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726186
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To test whether or not one of two biological mediators (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF-BB)) is superior to the other and compared with control groups for bone regeneration around implants based on histomorphometrical outcome measures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Box-type defects (10 × 5 × 5 mm) were prepared on the buccal sides of the left and right edentulous ridge in ten mongrel dogs. Implants were placed at each site, the defects either received (i) bovine-derived particulated bone mineral (DBBM) mixed with rhBMP-2 and a collagen membrane (CM) (DBBM/BMP-2), (ii) DBBM mixed with rhPDGF-BB and CM (DBBM/PDGF), (iii) DBBM and CM (DBBM) and (iv) empty control (control). Animals were euthanized post-surgery at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. Histomorphometrical analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

The mean percentages of regenerated area within total defect area amounted to 56.95% for DBBM/BMP-2, 48.86% for DBBM/PDFG, 33.44% for DBBM and 1.59% for control at 8 weeks, and 26.79% for DBBM/BMP-2, 23.78% for DBBM/PDFG, 30.21% for DBBM and 5.07% for control at 16 weeks with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean amount of regenerated bone was 26.97% for DBBM/BMP-2, 22.02% for DBBM/PDFG, 5.03% for DBBM and 1.25% for control at 8 weeks, and at 16 weeks, these values were lower in the two groups with biological mediators (DBBM/BMP-2 = 13.35%; DBBM/PDGF = 6.96%) and only slightly increased in group DBBM (10.68%) and the control group (4.95%) compared with 8 weeks. The first bone-to-implant contact values on the buccal side were minimal for DBBM/BMP-2 (0.57 mm) and maximal for control (3.72 mm) at 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of biological mediators (rhBMP-2 and rhPDGF-BB) can increase the amount of bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects compared with controls at 8 weeks, but not at 16 weeks due to enhanced hard tissue remodeling processes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Regeneration / Dental Implants / Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis / Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Publication country: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Regeneration / Dental Implants / Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis / Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Publication country: DENMARK / DINAMARCA / DK