Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limb patterning genes and heterochronic development of the emu wing bud.
Smith, Craig A; Farlie, Peter G; Davidson, Nadia M; Roeszler, Kelly N; Hirst, Claire; Oshlack, Alicia; Lambert, David M.
Affiliation
  • Smith CA; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800 Australia.
  • Farlie PG; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052 Australia.
  • Davidson NM; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052 Australia.
  • Roeszler KN; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052 Australia.
  • Hirst C; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800 Australia.
  • Oshlack A; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052 Australia.
  • Lambert DM; Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111 Australia.
Evodevo ; 7: 26, 2016.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28031782
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The forelimb of the flightless emu is a vestigial structure, with greatly reduced wing elements and digit loss. To explore the molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with the evolution of vestigial wings and loss of flight in the emu, key limb patterning genes were examined in developing embryos.

METHODS:

Limb development was compared in emu versus chicken embryos. Immunostaining for cell proliferation markers was used to analyze growth of the emu forelimb and hindlimb buds. Expression patterns of limb patterning genes were studied, using whole-mount in situ hybridization (for mRNA localization) and RNA-seq (for mRNA expression levels).

RESULTS:

The forelimb of the emu embryo showed heterochronic development compared to that in the chicken, with the forelimb bud being retarded in its development. Early outgrowth of the emu forelimb bud is characterized by a lower level of cell proliferation compared the hindlimb bud, as assessed by PH3 immunostaining. In contrast, there were no obvious differences in apoptosis in forelimb versus hindlimb buds (cleaved caspase 3 staining). Most key patterning genes were expressed in emu forelimb buds similarly to that observed in the chicken, but with smaller expression domains. However, expression of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) mRNA, which is central to anterior-posterior axis development, was delayed in the emu forelimb bud relative to other patterning genes. Regulators of Shh expression, Gli3 and HoxD13, also showed altered expression levels in the emu forelimb bud.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data reveal heterochronic but otherwise normal expression of most patterning genes in the emu vestigial forelimb. Delayed Shh expression may be related to the small and vestigial structure of the emu forelimb bud. However, the genetic mechanism driving retarded emu wing development is likely to rest within the forelimb field of the lateral plate mesoderm, predating the expression of patterning genes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Evodevo Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Evodevo Year: 2016 Document type: Article