Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of a Condensed Protocol That Reduces Effort and Cost of NIA-AA Guidelines for Neuropathologic Assessment of Alzheimer Disease.
Flanagan, Margaret E; Marshall, Desiree A; Shofer, Jane B; Montine, Kathleen S; Nelson, Peter T; Montine, Thomas J; Keene, C Dirk.
Affiliation
  • Flanagan ME; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Marshall DA; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Shofer JB; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Montine KS; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Nelson PT; Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Montine TJ; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Keene CD; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol ; 76(1): 39-43, 2017 01 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28062571
Concerns regarding resource expenditures have been expressed about the 2012 NIA-AA Sponsored Guidelines for neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer disease (AD) and related dementias. Here, we investigated a cost-reducing Condensed Protocol and its effectiveness in maintaining the diagnostic performance of Guidelines in assessing AD, Lewy body disease (LBD), microvascular brain injury, hippocampal sclerosis (HS), and congophilic amyloid angiopathy (CAA). The Condensed Protocol consolidates the same 20 regions into 5 tissue cassettes at ∼75% lower cost. A 28 autopsy brain-retrospective cohort was selected for varying levels of neuropathologic features in the Guidelines (Original Protocol), as well as an 18 consecutive autopsy brain prospective cohort. Three neuropathologists at 2 sites performed blinded evaluations of these cases. Lesion specificity was similar between Original and Condensed Protocols. Sensitivities for AD neuropathologic change, LBD, HS, and CAA were not substantially impacted by the Condensed Protocol, whereas sensitivity for microvascular lesions (MVLs) was decreased. Specificity for CAA was decreased using the Condensed Protocol when compared with the Original Protocol. Our results show that the Condensed Protocol is a viable alternative to the NIA-AA guidelines for AD neuropathologic change, LBD, and HS, but not MVLs or CAA, and may be a practical alternative in some practice settings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cost Savings / Practice Guidelines as Topic / National Institute on Aging (U.S.) / Alzheimer Disease Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cost Savings / Practice Guidelines as Topic / National Institute on Aging (U.S.) / Alzheimer Disease Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom