Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of sharps injuries among home care aides: Results of the Safe Home Care survey.
Brouillette, Natalie M; Quinn, Margaret M; Kriebel, David; Markkanen, Pia K; Galligan, Catherine J; Sama, Susan R; Gore, Rebecca J; Laramie, Angela K; Davis, Letitia.
Affiliation
  • Brouillette NM; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Quinn MM; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA. Electronic address: Margaret_Quinn@uml.edu.
  • Kriebel D; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Markkanen PK; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Galligan CJ; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Sama SR; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Gore RJ; College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA.
  • Laramie AK; Occupational Health Surveillance Program, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA.
  • Davis L; Occupational Health Surveillance Program, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(4): 377-383, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063731
OBJECTIVES: Home care (HC) aides constitute an essential, rapidly growing workforce. Technology advances are enabling complex medical care at home, including procedures requiring the percutaneous use of sharp medical devices, also known as sharps. Objectives were to quantify risks of sharps injuries (SI) in a large HC aide population, compare risks between major occupational groups, and evaluate SI risk factors. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was administered to aides hired by HC agencies and directly by clients. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight aides completed questions about SI and potential risk factors occurring in the 12 months before the survey. SI rates were calculated and Poisson regression models identified risk factors. RESULTS: Aides had a 2% annual risk of experiencing at least 1 SI (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.6). Client-hired aides, men, and immigrants had a higher risk than their counterparts. Risk factors among all HC aides included helping a client use a sharp device (rate ratio [RR], 5.62; 95% CI, 2.75-11.50), observing used sharps lying around the home (RR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.27-5.67), and caring for physically aggressive clients (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.36-5.85). CONCLUSIONS: HC aides experience serious risks of SI. Preventive interventions are needed, including safety training for clients and their families, as well as aides.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Needlestick Injuries / Home Health Aides Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Needlestick Injuries / Home Health Aides Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States