Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Validation of a Methodology to Reduce Mortality Using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator.
Keller, Deborah S; Kroll, Donald; Papaconstantinou, Harry T; Ellis, C Neal.
Affiliation
  • Keller DS; Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: debby_keller@hotmail.com.
  • Kroll D; Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System, Biloxi, MS.
  • Papaconstantinou HT; Department of Surgery, Baylor Scott & White, Temple, TX.
  • Ellis CN; Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University of the Health Sciences Permian Basin, Odessa, TX.
J Am Coll Surg ; 224(4): 602-607, 2017 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28088600
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To identify patients with a high risk of 30-day mortality after elective surgery, who may benefit from referral for tertiary care, an institution-specific process using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) Risk Calculator was developed. The goal was to develop and validate the methodology. Our hypothesis was that the process could optimize referrals and reduce mortality. STUDY

DESIGN:

A VASQIP risk score was calculated for all patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) facility. After statistical analysis, a VASQIP risk score of 3.3% predicted mortality was selected as the institutional threshold for referral to a tertiary care center. The model predicted that 16% of patients would require referral, and 30-day mortality would be reduced by 73% at the referring institution. The main outcomes measures were the actual vs predicted referrals and mortality rates at the referring and receiving facilities.

RESULTS:

The validation included 565 patients; 90 (16%) had VASQIP risk scores greater than 3.3% and were identified for referral; 60 consented. In these patients, there were 16 (27%) predicted mortalities, but only 4 actual deaths (p = 0.007) at the receiving institution. When referral was not indicated, the model predicted 4 mortalities (1%), but no actual deaths (p = 0.1241).

CONCLUSIONS:

These data validate this methodology to identify patients for referral to a higher level of care, reducing mortality at the referring institutions and significantly improving patient outcomes. This methodology can help guide decisions on referrals and optimize patient care. Further application and studies are warranted.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Care / Referral and Consultation / Health Status Indicators / Elective Surgical Procedures / Quality Improvement / Veterans Health / Hospitals, Veterans Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Surg Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Care / Referral and Consultation / Health Status Indicators / Elective Surgical Procedures / Quality Improvement / Veterans Health / Hospitals, Veterans Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Coll Surg Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article