[Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study].
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao
; 37(1): 1-5, 2017 Jan 20.
Article
in Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-28109090
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate cancer receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) using three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems.METHODS:
From February, 2014 to January 2016, 72 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent LRP with 2D or 3D imaging systems performed by a single experienced surgeon. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and functional and oncologic outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed.RESULTS:
Thirty-six patients underwent 3D LRP and the other 36 patients underwent 2D LRP. Compared with 2D LRP group, 3D LRP group had a significantly shorter operative time (167 vs 218 min, P<0.001), a smaller volume of intraoperative blood loss (86.11 vs 177.78 mL, P<0.001) and a better early urinary continence outcome (88.89% vs 63.89%, P=0.026). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of complications, potency outcome or biochemical recurrence-free rate.CONCLUSION:
Compared with 2D LRP, 3D LRP shortens the operative time, reduces intraoperative blood loss and is associated with a better early urinary continence outcome in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Search on Google
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Prostatectomy
/
Prostatic Neoplasms
/
Laparoscopy
/
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Type of study:
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limits:
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Zh
Journal:
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao
Year:
2017
Document type:
Article