Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Formalin disinfection of prostate biopsy needles may reduce post-biopsy infectious complications.
Singla, N; Walker, J; Woldu, S L; Passoni, N M; de la Fuente, K; Roehrborn, C G.
Affiliation
  • Singla N; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Walker J; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Woldu SL; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Passoni NM; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • de la Fuente K; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Roehrborn CG; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 20(2): 216-220, 2017 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28117384
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether formalin disinfection of prostate biopsy needles between cores reduces post-biopsy urinary tract infections (UTIs). METHODS: We reviewed a single-surgeon experience of transrectal prostate biopsies from 2010 to 2014. Biopsies were performed in either an operative suite, where 10% formalin was used to disinfect the needle tip between each biopsy core, or an outpatient clinic, where formalin was not used. Our primary outcome was post-biopsy UTI rates, defined as a positive urine culture within 30 days of biopsy. Infection severity was characterized by the need for admission. Patient demographics, prostate size, prior biopsies, prior UTIs, pre-biopsy antibiotics and cultures and post-biopsy cultures were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of post-biopsy UTIs. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 756 patients were included for analysis, including 253 who received formalin disinfection and 503 who did not. Of these, 32 patients (4.2%) experienced post-biopsy UTIs, with 8 requiring admission (all without formalin use). Infection rates were more than double in the group that did not receive formalin (5.2% vs 2.3%, P=0.085). More patients in the formalin group had undergone prior biopsies (73.9% vs 31.8%, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, prior UTI (odds ratio (OR) 3.77, P=0.006) was a significant predictor for post-biopsy infection, whereas formalin disinfection trended towards a protective effect (OR 0.41, P=0.055). CONCLUSION: Infectious complications following prostate biopsy may be mitigated by the use of formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle between cores.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Urinary Tract Infections / Biopsy, Needle / Formaldehyde Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Urinary Tract Infections / Biopsy, Needle / Formaldehyde Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom