Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiency of "Prescribe Vida Saludable", a health promotion innovation. Pilot phase.
Sanz-Guinea, Aitor; Espinosa, Maite; Grandes, Gonzalo; Sáncheza, Álvaro; Martínez, Catalina; Pombo, Haizea; Bully, Paola; Cortada, Josep.
Affiliation
  • Sanz-Guinea A; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain. Electronic address: asanzguinea@gmail.com.
  • Espinosa M; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Grandes G; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Sáncheza Á; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Martínez C; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Pombo H; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Bully P; Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Cortada J; Primary Healthcare Centre Deusto, Basque Healthcare Service, Osakidetza, Deusto (Bilbao), Spain.
Gac Sanit ; 31(5): 404-409, 2017.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196752
OBJECTIVE: "Prescribe Vida Saludable" (PVS) is an organisational innovation designed to optimise the promotion of multiple healthy habits in primary healthcare. It aims to estimate the cost effectiveness and cost-utility of prescribing physical activity in the pilot phase of the PVS programme, compared to the routine clinical practice of promoting physical activity in primary healthcare. METHODS: An economic evaluation of the quasi-experimental pilot phase of PVS was carried out. In the four control centres, a systematic sample was selected of 194 patients who visited the centre in a single year and who did not comply with physical activity recommendations. In the four intervention centres, 122 patients who received their first physical activity prescription were consecutively enrolled. The costs were evaluated from the perspective of the PVS programme using bottom-up methodology. The effectiveness (proportion of patients who changed their physical activity) as well as the utility were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and a sensitivity analysis was performed with bootstrapping and 1,000 replications. RESULTS: Information was obtained from 35% of control cases and 62% of intervention cases. The ICUR was €1,234.66/Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and the ICER was €4.12. In 98.3% of the simulations, the ICUR was below the €30,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of physical activity was demonstrably within acceptable cost-utility limits in the pilot PVS phase, even from a conservative perspective.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Healthy Lifestyle / Health Promotion Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Gac Sanit Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Healthy Lifestyle / Health Promotion Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Gac Sanit Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: Spain