Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.
Davison, Niall; Payne, Katherine; Eden, Martin; McAllister, Marion; Roberts, Stephen A; Ingram, Stuart; Black, Graeme C M; Hall, Georgina.
Affiliation
  • Davison N; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Payne K; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Eden M; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • McAllister M; School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Roberts SA; Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Ingram S; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Black GCM; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Hall G; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Genet Med ; 19(9): 1032-1039, 2017 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28301457
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Broadening access to genomic testing and counseling will be necessary to realize the benefits of personalized health care. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a standardized genomic care model for inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) and of using selected measures to quantify its impact on patients.

METHODS:

A pre-/post- prospective cohort study recruited 98 patients affected by IRD to receive standardized multidisciplinary care. A checklist was used to assess the fidelity of the care process. Three patient-reported outcome measures-the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24), the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A), and the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D)-and a resource-use questionnaire were administered to investigate rates of missingness, ceiling effects, and changes over time.

RESULTS:

The care model was delivered consistently. Higher rates of missingness were found for the genetic-specific measure (GCOS-24). Considerable ceiling effects were observed for the generic measure (EQ-5D). The ICECAP-A yielded less missing data without significant ceiling effects. It was feasible to use telephone interviews for follow-up data collection.

CONCLUSION:

The study highlighted challenges and solutions associated with efforts to standardize genomic care for IRD. The study identified appropriate methods for a future definitive study to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the care model.Genet Med advance online publication 02 March 2017.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Genomics / Delivery of Health Care / Standard of Care Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Genomics / Delivery of Health Care / Standard of Care Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research / Patient_preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
...