Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The psychosocial effects of the Li-Fraumeni Education and Early Detection (LEAD) program on individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Ross, Jessica; Bojadzieva, Jasmina; Peterson, Susan; Noblin, Sarah Jane; Yzquierdo, Rebecca; Askins, Martha; Strong, Louise.
Affiliation
  • Ross J; Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bojadzieva J; Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Peterson S; The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Noblin SJ; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Yzquierdo R; The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Askins M; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Strong L; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Genet Med ; 19(9): 1064-1070, 2017 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28301458
PURPOSE: In the past 5 years, new screening protocols have been developed that provide improved cancer screening options for individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Very little has been published on the psychosocial impact of these screening protocols. The goals of this study were to determine how participation in screening impacts individuals psychosocially, to examine the benefits and drawbacks of screening, and to evaluate possible barriers to continued screening. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study consisting of semistructured phone interviews conducted from December 2015 to February 2016 with 20 individuals attending the LFS screening program at MD Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS: Data analysis showed that benefits of screening include early detection, peace of mind, centralized screening, knowledge providing power, and screening making LFS seem more livable. Perceived drawbacks included logistical issues, difficulty navigating the system, screening being draining, and significant negative emotional reactions such as anxiety, fear, and skepticism. Regardless of the emotions that were present, 100% of participants planned on continuing screening in the program. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the perceived benefits of screening outweigh the drawbacks of screening. Individuals in this screening program appeared to have improved psychosocial well-being because of their access to the screening program.Genet Med advance online publication 16 March 2017.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States