Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global fit concept in revision hip arthroplasty for cementless press-fit femoral stems.
Canovas, F; LeBeguec, P; Batard, J; Gaillard, F; Dagneaux, L.
Affiliation
  • Canovas F; Unité de chirurgie du membre inférieur, département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
  • LeBeguec P; 11, Galeries du Théâtre, 35000 Rennes, France.
  • Batard J; Unité de chirurgie du membre inférieur, département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
  • Gaillard F; Unité de chirurgie du membre inférieur, département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
  • Dagneaux L; Unité de chirurgie du membre inférieur, département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 371, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Electronic address: louisdagneaux@gmail.com.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 103(4): 579-581, 2017 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28341184
ABSTRACT
A revision stem may be required after a femoral extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is made during revision hip arthroplasty. The two main complications of straight cementless femoral stems are subsidence due to inadequate osteointegration and stress-shielding. We will describe an original revision method with ETO that uses a straight cementless stem. The goal of this method was to achieve the most extensive press-fit possible during stem implantation to improve the transmission of stresses to the bone and to prevent reduction in bone density. The intramedullary preparation was done after closure and fixation of the ETO, which allows impaction of the revision stem with metaphyseal and diaphyseal press-fit. We report encouraging results with preservation of periprosthetic bone stock and good osteointegration of these revision stems at the final follow-up. Pronounced sagittal curvature or large bone defects are contraindications for this technique.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femur / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femur / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France