Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Application of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy in anterior resection of low rectal cancer].
Zhao, Yuzhou; Han, Guangsen; Huo, Mingke; Wei, Li; Zou, Qiyun; Zhang, Yuji; Li, Jian; Gu, Yanhui; Cao, Yanghui; Zhang, Shijia.
Affiliation
  • Han G; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China. hnhanguangsen@126.com.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 20(4): 439-442, 2017 Apr 25.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28440526
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the application of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy in anterior resection of low rectal cancer.

METHOD:

From May 2015 to March 2016, 70 consecutive low rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection and preventive transverse colostomy in our department were recruited in this prospective study. According to the random number table method, 70 patients were divided into three-stitch transverse colostomy group(observation group, n=35) and traditional transverse colostomy group(control group, n=35). Procedure of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy was as follows firstly, at the upper 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from outside to inside, then the needle belt line went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone. At the lower 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from inside to outside, then silk went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone again and was ligatured. Finally, in the upper and lower ends of the stoma, 7# silk was used to suture and fix transverse seromuscular layer and the skin. The operation time and morbidity of postoperative complications associated with colostomy were compared between two groups.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05). The operative time of observation group was shorter than that of control group [(3.2±1.3) min vs. (15.5±3.4) min, P<0.05]. Incidences of colostomy skin-mucous separation, dermatitis, stoma rebound were significantly lower in observation group [5.7%(2/35) vs. 34.3%(12/35), P=0.007; 8.6%(3/35) vs. 31.4%(11/35), P=0.036; 0 vs. 17.1%(6/35), P=0.025, respectively], while incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse in two groups were similar (both P>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Compared with traditional transverse colostomy method, the three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy has more operating advantages and can reduce postoperative complications associated with colostomy.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Rectal Neoplasms / Colostomy / Suture Techniques / Treatment Outcome Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Rectal Neoplasms / Colostomy / Suture Techniques / Treatment Outcome Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article