Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coping with stigma and discrimination: evidence from mental health service users in England.
Isaksson, A; Corker, E; Cotney, J; Hamilton, S; Pinfold, V; Rose, D; Rüsch, N; Henderson, C; Thornicroft, G; Evans-Lacko, S.
Affiliation
  • Isaksson A; Department of Psychiatry,Faculty of Medicine,University of Freiburg,Germany.
  • Corker E; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
  • Cotney J; McPin Foundation,London,UK.
  • Hamilton S; McPin Foundation,London,UK.
  • Pinfold V; McPin Foundation,London,UK.
  • Rose D; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
  • Rüsch N; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II,University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg,Germany.
  • Henderson C; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
  • Thornicroft G; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
  • Evans-Lacko S; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 27(6): 577-588, 2018 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28462751
AIMS: Mental health stigma and discrimination are significant problems. Common coping orientations include: concealing mental health problems, challenging others and educating others. We describe the use of common stigma coping orientations and explain variations within a sample of English mental health service users. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data were collected as part of the Viewpoint survey of mental health service users' experiences of discrimination (n = 3005). Linear regression analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with the three stigma coping orientations. RESULTS: The most common coping orientation was to conceal mental health problems (73%), which was strongly associated with anticipated discrimination. Only 51% ever challenged others because of discriminating behaviour, this being related to experienced discrimination, but also to higher confidence to tackle stigma. CONCLUSIONS: Although stigma coping orientations vary by context, individuals often choose to conceal problems, which is associated with greater anticipated and experienced discrimination and less confidence to challenge stigma. The direction of this association requires further investigation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prejudice / Stereotyping / Adaptation, Psychological / Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Social Stigma / Social Discrimination / Mental Disorders / Mental Health Services Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prejudice / Stereotyping / Adaptation, Psychological / Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Social Stigma / Social Discrimination / Mental Disorders / Mental Health Services Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: United kingdom