Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pen Torch Transillumination: Difficult Venepuncture Made Easy.
Cai, Elijah Zhengyang; Sankaran, Kalarani; Tan, Monica; Chan, Yiong Huak; Lim, Thiam Chye.
Affiliation
  • Cai EZ; Department of Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. elijahcai@gmail.com.
  • Sankaran K; Department of Nursing, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan M; Department of Anesthesiology, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chan YH; Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Lim TC; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
World J Surg ; 41(9): 2401-2408, 2017 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28484817
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Our novel technique of pen torch transillumination (PTI) uses a cheap and easily available instrument (Penlite-LP212®, Energizer®, Missouri, USA) to visualize superficial veins invisible to the naked eye. We evaluate the efficacy of PTI in improving venepuncture success rate (SR) for patients with poor venous access.

METHODS:

This prospective randomized controlled trial looked at adult patients (n = 69) aged 21-90 with difficult venous access (history of ≥3 consecutive attempts required for successful cannulation during the current admission) requiring non-emergent venepuncture. Patients underwent venepuncture over the upper-limb using one of the following conventional venepuncture (control); Veinlite® EMS (TransLite®, Texas, USA), a commercial transillumination device; PTI. Outcome measures were successful cannulation within 2 attempts and total duration of venepuncture. Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.

RESULTS:

A significantly larger number of patients had successful venepuncture within 2 attempts using PTI (22/23, 95.7%) and Veinlite (23/23, 100%), compared to the controls (7/23, 30.4%) (p < 0.05). The total duration required for successful venepuncture was significantly shorter for Veinlite (mean 3.7 min, 1.0-5.3 min) and PTI (mean 8.5 min, range 1.08-27 min) compared to the controls (mean 23.2 min, range 1.88-46.5 min) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

PTI allows users to visualize veins invisible to the naked eye. Thrombosed/tortuous veins, branch points and valves, are easily identified and avoided. It has comparable efficacy to Veinlite® and is cheaper (Veinlite®-USD 227 vs. Penlite-LP212®-USD 7.00) and more easily available. PTI improves patient care, especially in developing regions where costs are a concern.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Veins / Transillumination / Phlebotomy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: World J Surg Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Singapore

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Veins / Transillumination / Phlebotomy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: World J Surg Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Singapore