Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of SmartPill® wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinal transit time: Intra-subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy.
Diaz Tartera, H O; Webb, D-L; Al-Saffar, A Kh; Halim, M A; Lindberg, G; Sangfelt, P; Hellström, P M.
Affiliation
  • Diaz Tartera HO; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Webb DL; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Al-Saffar AK; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Halim MA; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lindberg G; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Sangfelt P; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Hellström PM; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 29(10): 1-9, 2017 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28524600
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is interest in ultimately combining endoscopy and motility assessments. Gastric emptying (GET), small bowel (SBTT), colon (CTT) and whole gut transit (WGTT) times are conveniently obtained by SmartPill® wireless motility capsule (WMC) that records luminal pH, temperature and pressure. Reproducibility within same subjects and accuracy of software derived times (MotiliGI® ) were investigated for diagnostic application. GET and SBTT were separately measured using video capsule endoscopy (VCE). The aim of this investigation was to assess same subject reproducibility of WMC, accuracy of software derived transit times and relate to Pillcam® SB (small bowel) VCE motility data.

METHODS:

Seventy three healthy adults ingested a 260 kcal mixed meal followed by WMC tests. Food intake was permitted after 6 hours. Regional transit data was obtained for GET, SBTT and CTT, the sum yielding WGTT. Nineteen subjects repeated WMC tests 2 or 4 weeks later; a separate 70 underwent VCE while fasted. KEY

RESULTS:

Visually derived data from WMC yielded GET 3.46±0.27, SBTT 5.15±0.21, CTT 20.76±1.19 and WGTT 29.53±1.28 hours (mean±SEM). Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) against software derived results were GET 0.78 (P<.0001), SBTT 0.28 (P<.05), CTT 0.96 (P<.0001), WGTT 0.99 (P<.0001). VCE yielded lower GET (0.71±0.08 hours) and SBTT (4.15±0.13 hours). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES GET, SBTT, CTT and WGTT obtained by WMC are commensurate with literature values, including by other methods. Visually and software derived transit times have strongest correlations for CTT and WGTT. WMC yields longer GET and SBTT than VCE, perhaps due to meal related effects on motility.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Software / Gastrointestinal Transit / Capsule Endoscopy Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Software / Gastrointestinal Transit / Capsule Endoscopy Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden