Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The performance of an efficient dairy system using a combination of nitrogen leaching mitigation strategies in a variable climate.
Beukes, P C; Romera, A J; Gregorini, P; Macdonald, K A; Glassey, C B; Shepherd, M A.
Affiliation
  • Beukes PC; DairyNZ Ltd., Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Electronic address: pierre.beukes@dairynz.co.nz.
  • Romera AJ; DairyNZ Ltd., Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
  • Gregorini P; DairyNZ Ltd., Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
  • Macdonald KA; DairyNZ Ltd., Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
  • Glassey CB; DairyNZ Ltd., Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
  • Shepherd MA; AgResearch, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Sci Total Environ ; 599-600: 1791-1801, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28545206
ABSTRACT
An efficient dairy system, that implemented a combination of nitrogen (N) leaching mitigation strategies including lower N fertilizer input, standing cows off pasture for part of the day in autumn and winter (stand-off), and importing limited amounts of low protein supplements was evaluated over four consecutive years of a farmlet study. This efficient system consistently demonstrated a lower measured annual N leaching of 40 to 50% compared with a baseline system representing current practice with no mitigations. To maximize return from this system fewer cows but of higher genetic merit were used resulting in an average decrease in milk production of 2% and operating profit by 5% compared with the baseline system. The magnitude of the N leaching reduction from mitigation strategies was predicted in pre-trial modelling. Using similar mechanistic models in a post-trial study, we were able to satisfactorily predict the trends in the observed N leaching data over the four years. This enabled us to use the calibrated models to explore the contributions of the different mitigation strategies to the overall leaching reduction in the efficient system. In one of the years half of the leaching reduction was achieved by the 'input' component of the strategy (less feed N flowing through the herd from lower fertilizer use, less grass grown, and low-protein supplement use), while the other half was achieved by the stand-off strategy. However, these contributions are determined by the weather of a particular year. We estimate that on average stand-off would contribute 60% and 'input' 40% to the reduction. The implication is that farmers facing nutrient loss limitations have some current and some future technologies available to them for meeting these limitations. A shift towards the mitigations described here can result in a downward trend in their own N-loss metrics. The challenge will be to negate any reductions in production and profit, and remain competitive.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dairying / Environmental Pollution / Animal Feed / Nitrogen Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2017 Document type: Article Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dairying / Environmental Pollution / Animal Feed / Nitrogen Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2017 Document type: Article Publication country: HOLANDA / HOLLAND / NETHERLANDS / NL / PAISES BAJOS / THE NETHERLANDS