Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Improving the quality of cancer pain management in palliative care unit: Targeted clinical audit]. / Qualité de la prise en charge de la douleur du cancer en unité de soins palliatifs : audit clinique ciblé.
Tricou, Colombe; Ruer, Murielle; Ledoux, Mathilde; Perceau-Chambard, Élise; Decrept, Dorothée; Chabloz, Claire; Filbet, Marilène.
Affiliation
  • Tricou C; Hospices civils de Lyon, centre hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Department of Palliative Care, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
  • Ruer M; Hospices civils de Lyon, centre hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Department of Palliative Care, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
  • Ledoux M; L'hôpital Nord-Ouest, Palliative Care Unit, 1, boulevard JB-Martin, 69170 Tarare, France.
  • Perceau-Chambard É; Hospices civils de Lyon, centre hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Department of Palliative Care, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
  • Decrept D; Hospices civils de Lyon, centre hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Department of Palliative Care, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
  • Chabloz C; Coordination for the Evaluation of Professional Practices in Healthcare in the Rhône-Alpes region, 162, avenue Lacassagne, Bâtiment A, 7(e) étage, 69424 Lyon cedex 03, France.
  • Filbet M; Hospices civils de Lyon, centre hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Department of Palliative Care, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France. Electronic address: marilene.filbet@chu-lyon.fr.
Bull Cancer ; 104(7-8): 636-643, 2017.
Article in Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549593
Goal This study aims to assess the quality of the cancer pain management in Palliative care unit. METHOD: The method used was the targeted clinical audit. The audit grid was built according to the recommendations of the pilot Committee, and tested until the final version with 19 items was obtained. In this retrospective study, 60 consecutive patients were studied on 2 periods of time. The first one (T1) shows the gap between the patient's chart and the expected standard, and proposes corrective measures. The second one (T2) re-assesses, using the same items list, the efficacy of these measures. RESULTS: After the corrective measures, the patients' medical record documentation was significantly improved at T2 for: neuropathic pain assessment improved, from 3% (T1) to 67% (T2) (P<0.001), so did pain assessment during the titration, from 6.7% (T1) to 90% (T2) (P<0.001). The overdoses symptoms assessment improved from 17% at T1 to 93% at T2, (P=0.002) and breakthrough pain evaluation improved from 3% at T1 to 73% at T2, (P<0.001). The pain reassessment after the rescue doses improved from 10% at T1 to 73% at T2 (P<0.001). The other points improved but not significantly. CONCLUSION: The quality of the pain cancer management was improved during the audit, but some points (patient education and in patient medical record documentation) can be improved. We need to continue to implement the improvement measures in our unit.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Quality of Health Care / Quality Improvement / Breakthrough Pain / Pain Management / Cancer Pain / Neuralgia Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: Fr Journal: Bull Cancer Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Quality of Health Care / Quality Improvement / Breakthrough Pain / Pain Management / Cancer Pain / Neuralgia Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: Fr Journal: Bull Cancer Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France Country of publication: France