Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Approximal morphology as predictor of approximal caries in primary molar teeth.
Cortes, A; Martignon, S; Qvist, V; Ekstrand, Kim Rud.
Affiliation
  • Cortes A; UNICA - Caries Research Unit, Research Vice-rectory, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Martignon S; Cariology & Endodontics, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Allé 20, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Qvist V; UNICA - Caries Research Unit, Research Vice-rectory, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Ekstrand KR; Dental Innovation and Translation Centre, Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(2): 951-959, 2018 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28735465
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the predictive power of the morphology of the distal surface on 1st and mesial surface on 2nd primary molar teeth on caries development in young children. SAMPLE AND

METHODS:

Out of 101 3-to 4-year-old children from an on-going study, 62 children, for whom parents' informed consent was given, participated. Upper and lower molar teeth of one randomly selected side received a 2-day temporarily separation. Bitewing radiographs and silicone impressions of interproximal area (IPA) were obtained. One-year procedures were repeated in 52 children (84%). The morphology of the distal surfaces of the first molar teeth and the mesial surfaces on the second molar teeth (n=208) was scored from the occlusal aspect on images from the baseline resin models resulting in four IPA variants concave-concave; concave-convex; convex-concave, and convex-convex. Approximal caries on the surface in question was radiographically assessed as absent/present.

RESULTS:

Of the 52 children examined at follow-up, 31 children (60%) had 1-4 concave surfaces. In total 53 (25%) of the 208 surfaces were concave. A total of 22 children (43%) had 1-4 approximal lesions adding up to 59 lesions. Multiple logistic regression analyses disclosed that gender, surface morphology on one of the approximal surfaces (focus-surface), and adjacent-surface morphology were significantly related to caries development (p values ≤ 0.03). The odds ratio for developing caries in the focus-surface/adjacent-surface in the four IPA variants were convex-convex, 1.0; convex-concave, 5.5 (CI 2.0-14.7); concave-convex, 12.9 (CI 4.1-40.3); and concave-concave, 15.7 (CI 5.1-48.3).

CONCLUSION:

Morphology of approximal surfaces in primary molar teeth, in particular both surfaces being concave, significantly influences the risk of developing caries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The concave morphology of approximal surfaces can predict future caries lesions supporting specific home-care and in-office preventive strategies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth, Deciduous / Dental Caries / Molar Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tooth, Deciduous / Dental Caries / Molar Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Colombia