Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Impact of rotational coronary angiography in the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Impacto de la angiografía coronaria rotacional en la cantidad total de contraste administrado y la exposición a las radiaciones ionizantes en pacientes en los que se realizan procedimientos coronarios invasivos: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.
Fernández-Rodríguez, Diego; Anmad Shihadeh, Leydimar; Martos-Maine, José L; Couto-Comba, Patricia; Quijada-Fumero, Alejandro; Pimienta, Raquel; Grillo-Pérez, José J; Rodríguez-Esteban, Marcos; Pérez-Hernández, Horacio; Hernández-Afonso, Julio; Bosa Ojeda, Francisco.
Affiliation
  • Fernández-Rodríguez D; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, España. Electronic address: d.fernan.2@hotmail.com.
  • Anmad Shihadeh L; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Martos-Maine JL; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Couto-Comba P; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Quijada-Fumero A; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Pimienta R; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Grillo-Pérez JJ; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Rodríguez-Esteban M; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Pérez-Hernández H; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Hernández-Afonso J; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, España.
  • Bosa Ojeda F; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, España.
Arch Cardiol Mex ; 88(4): 277-286, 2018.
Article in Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888725
BACKGROUND: Invasive coronary procedures involve the administration of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations, increasing morbidity and mortality. The rotational coronary angiography (RCA) allows acquiring multiple projections with a unique injection of iodinated contrast. To date, there are no meta-analyses specifically comparing RCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures, whether diagnostic or diagnostic and therapeutic. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the impact of RCA on the amount of iodinated contrast and the exposure to ionising radiations during invasive coronary procedures. METHODS: A search in PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify studies, including diagnostic and diagnostic and therapeutic studies, comparing RCA and CCA. The manuscripts were evaluated on quality and biases, and were included if they analysed any of the following endpoints: volume of contrast and exposure to ionising radiations measured as dose-area product, and Kerma-air or fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, with a total of 2,327 patients, were included in the final analysis (1,146 patients underwent RCA and 1,181 patients underwent CCA), with significant differences being detected in volume of contrast (standard difference in means [95% confidence interval] -1.887 [-2.472 to -1.302]; P<.001), dose-area product (-0.726 [-1.034 to -0.418]; P<.001), Kerma-air (-0.842 [-1.104 to -0.581]; P<.001), and fluoroscopy time (0.263 [-0.496 to -0.030]; P=.027). CONCLUSIONS: RCA reduces the volume of contrast and the exposure to radiation, evaluated as dose-area product, Kerma-air, and fluoroscopy time, in patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Angiography / Contrast Media Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: Es Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: Mexico

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Angiography / Contrast Media Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: Es Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: Mexico