Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methodology minute: A guide for infection preventionists for sizing up systematic reviews.
Grota, Patti; McKinley, Linda; Lopez, Emme.
Affiliation
  • Grota P; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX. Electronic address: Grota@uthscsa.edu.
  • McKinley L; Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, WI.
  • Lopez E; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(12): 1402-1404, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28935480
Systematic reviews have become a key strategy to identifying evidence-based practice guidelines in infection prevention. They are considered the highest level of evidence providing the most effective answers to practice questions. Infection preventionists need to become familiar with reading systematic reviews and learn to critically appraise the findings and implications for practice. A systematic literature review is a rigorous preplanned process established to answer a specific practice question. The preplanned methods are detailed in the final publication. There are several key components that should be outlined in systematic reviews, which are briefly reviewed here.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic / Evidence-Based Practice Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic / Evidence-Based Practice Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Infect Control Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States