Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Whole exome sequencing as a diagnostic adjunct to clinical testing in fetuses with structural abnormalities.
Fu, F; Li, R; Li, Y; Nie, Z-Q; Lei, T; Wang, D; Yang, X; Han, J; Pan, M; Zhen, L; Ou, Y; Li, J; Li, F-T; Jing, X; Li, D; Liao, C.
Affiliation
  • Fu F; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li R; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li Y; Guanzghou Umbilical Cord Blood Bank, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Nie ZQ; Epidemiology Division, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lei T; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wang D; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Yang X; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Han J; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Pan M; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhen L; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Ou Y; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li J; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li FT; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Jing X; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li D; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Liao C; Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 51(4): 493-502, 2018 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28976722
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) for monogenic disorders in fetuses with structural malformations and normal results on cytogenetic testing, and to describe information on pathogenic variants that is provided by WES. METHODS: Karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and WES were performed sequentially on stored samples from a cohort of 3949 pregnancies with fetal structural abnormalities detected on ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, referred between January 2011 and December 2015. Diagnostic rates of the three techniques were investigated overall, for phenotypic subgroups and for proband-only vs fetus-mother-father samples. Information on pathogenic variants was identified by WES. RESULTS: Overall, 18.2% (720/3949) of fetuses had an abnormal karyotype. Pathogenic copy number variants were detected on CMA in 8.2% (138/1680) of fetuses that had a normal karyotype result. WES performed on a subgroup of 196 fetuses with normal CMA and karyotype results revealed the putative genetic variants responsible for the abnormal phenotypes in 47 cases (24%). The molecular diagnosis rates for fetus-mother-father and proband-only samples were 26.5% (13/49) and 23.1% (34/147), respectively. Variants of uncertain significance were detected in 12.8% (25/196) of fetuses, of which 22 were identified in the fetal proband-only group (15%; 22/147) and three in the fetus-mother-father group (6.1%; 3/49). The incidental finding rate was 6.1% (12/196). CONCLUSIONS: WES is a promising method for the identification of genetic variants that cause structural abnormalities in fetuses with normal results on karyotyping and CMA. This enhanced diagnostic yield has the potential to improve the clinical management of pregnancies and to inform better the reproductive decisions of affected families. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abnormalities, Multiple / Down Syndrome / Abnormal Karyotype / Exome Sequencing Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abnormalities, Multiple / Down Syndrome / Abnormal Karyotype / Exome Sequencing Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United kingdom