Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Photon-Counting CT of the Brain: In Vivo Human Results and Image-Quality Assessment.
Pourmorteza, A; Symons, R; Reich, D S; Bagheri, M; Cork, T E; Kappler, S; Ulzheimer, S; Bluemke, D A.
Affiliation
  • Pourmorteza A; From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P., R.S., D.S.R., M.B., T.E.C., D.A.B.), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Symons R; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Reich DS; From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P., R.S., D.S.R., M.B., T.E.C., D.A.B.), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Bagheri M; Department of Imaging and Pathology (R.S.), Medical Imaging Research Centre, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Cork TE; From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P., R.S., D.S.R., M.B., T.E.C., D.A.B.), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Kappler S; Translational Neuroradiology Section (D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Ulzheimer S; From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P., R.S., D.S.R., M.B., T.E.C., D.A.B.), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Bluemke DA; From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.P., R.S., D.S.R., M.B., T.E.C., D.A.B.), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(12): 2257-2263, 2017 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982793
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Photon-counting detectors offer the potential for improved image quality for brain CT but have not yet been evaluated in vivo. The purpose of this study was to compare photon-counting detector CT with conventional energy-integrating detector CT for human brains. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Radiation dose-matched energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector head CT scans were acquired with standardized protocols (tube voltage/current, 120 kV(peak)/370 mAs) in both an anthropomorphic head phantom and 21 human asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 58.9 ± 8.5 years). Photon-counting detector thresholds were 22 and 52 keV (low-energy bin, 22-52 keV; high-energy bin, 52-120 keV). Image noise, gray matter, and white matter signal-to-noise ratios and GM-WM contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured. Image quality was scored by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the CT detector type. Reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT images were compared using a paired t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS:

Photon-counting detector CT images received higher reader scores for GM-WM differentiation with lower image noise (all P < .001). Intrareader and interreader reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.86 and 0.79, respectively). Quantitative analysis showed 12.8%-20.6% less image noise for photon-counting detector CT. The SNR of photon-counting detector CT was 19.0%-20.0% higher than of energy-integrating detector CT for GM and WM. The contrast-to-noise ratio of photon-counting detector CT was 15.7% higher for GM-WM contrast and 33.3% higher for GM-WM contrast-to-noise ratio.

CONCLUSIONS:

Photon-counting detector brain CT scans demonstrated greater gray-white matter contrast compared with conventional CT. This was due to both higher soft-tissue contrast and lower image noise for photon-counting CT.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Neuroimaging Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Neuroimaging Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article