Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The contribution of pain in determining the health status of cancer patients with bone metastases: A secondary analysis of data from three Phase III registration trials.
Mendoza, T R; Dueck, A C; Shi, Q; Ma, H; Zhang, J; Qian, Y; Cleeland, C S.
Affiliation
  • Mendoza TR; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Dueck AC; Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  • Shi Q; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Ma H; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Zhang J; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Qian Y; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Cleeland CS; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eur J Pain ; 22(3): 565-571, 2018 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29082574
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to provide a simple, descriptive health-status profile for cancer patients with bone metastases, based on the EuroQol EQ-5D, a tool commonly used to measure health utility scores, and to evaluate its association with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a legacy pain-assessment tool. Although pain is one of five health-status dimensions measured by the EQ-5D, our understanding of how pain relates to the other EQ-5D dimensions is limited.

METHODS:

We derived data from 5500 patients with bone metastases who completed the EQ-5D and BPI. Regression analyses examined how BPI severity and interference scores correlated with EQ-5D utility scores and how BPI items associated with EQ-5D items, for the entire sample and by disease-type subgroup.

RESULTS:

Regardless of cancer site, the percentage of patients reporting moderate/severe problems in each of the five EQ-5D dimensions were pain/discomfort, 78%; usual activities, 58%; mobility, 55%; anxiety/depression, 57%; and self-care, 26%. BPI pain interference explained more of the variability in the EQ-5D utility scores than did pain severity (R2  = 41% vs. 34%). BPI worst pain, average pain, pain now, interference with general activity, and interference with work significantly predicted EQ-5D pain/discomfort, with odds ratio estimates <1.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pain/discomfort was the worst-rated dimension of the EQ-5D in this population, but the relationship of this item to BPI pain severity was modest, suggesting that the single pain item of the EQ-5D may be of limited utility in studies for which pain is an endpoint.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Health-status dimensions include more than pain. We examine the contribution of pain severity and pain-related functional interference in determining the health status of cancer patients with bone metastases. The pain dimension from a health-status measure may be an inadequate metric in clinical trials/clinical practice when pain is an important outcome.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Neoplasms / Health Status / Cancer Pain Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Neoplasms / Health Status / Cancer Pain Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States