Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes after periviable ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
Drassinower, Daphnie; Coviello, Elizabeth; Landy, Helain J; Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia; Perez-Delboy, Annette; Friedman, Alexander M.
Affiliation
  • Drassinower D; a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , MedStar Georgetown University Hospital , Washington , DC , USA.
  • Coviello E; a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , MedStar Georgetown University Hospital , Washington , DC , USA.
  • Landy HJ; a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , MedStar Georgetown University Hospital , Washington , DC , USA.
  • Gyamfi-Bannerman C; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
  • Perez-Delboy A; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
  • Friedman AM; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(6): 932-938, 2019 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29108444
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cerclage placed for a sonographically short cervix has been shown to reduce the risk of preterm delivery in women with a history of prior preterm birth. While short cervix is traditionally placed before viability, the threshold gestational age at which viability is achieved continues to decrease, and, as a result, a larger subset of women may be ineligible to receive this potentially beneficial procedure.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the association between obstetric outcomes and perioperative complications after placement of an ultrasound-indicated cerclage at periviability compared to placement in the previable period.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage evaluated obstetric outcomes and perioperative complications based on gestational age at cerclage placement. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage was considered to have been placed at periviability if placed at 22 to <24 weeks (exposed) and at previability if placed at 16 to <22 weeks gestational age (unexposed). The primary outcome was preterm delivery <36 weeks. Secondary outcomes included mean gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery <32 weeks, <28, and <24 weeks, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), chorioamnionitis, and perioperative complications. Adjusted analyses were performed to account for demographic and obstetric factors.

RESULTS:

Of the 426 patients included in the analysis, 94 (22%) had cerclage placed between ≥22 weeks to <24 weeks, while 332 (78%) had cerclage placed at <22 weeks. On univariate analysis, women who had a periviable cerclage placed were less likely to have a recurrent preterm delivery <36 weeks compared to women with previable cerclage placement (26.6 versus 38.3%, respectively, p = .04). The adjusted model did not demonstrate a significant difference in risk for preterm delivery <36 weeks associated with periviable versus previable cerclage (odds ratio 0.66, 95%CI 0.37-1.17). Secondary outcomes were similar between the previable and periviable groups, including mean gestational age at delivery (35.1 versus 36.2 weeks, respectively, p = .08) and preterm delivery before 32-week gestation (20.7 versus 13.8%, respectively, p = .17). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were rare and rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Obstetric outcomes between patients receiving periviable and previable cerclage are similar. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage placement is associated with a relatively low rate of complications. Given the evidence supporting benefit of cerclage for women with short ultrasound cervical length and prior preterm birth, our findings demonstrate that benefits of placement at ≥22 weeks to <24 weeks may outweigh risks.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Incompetence / Cerclage, Cervical / Premature Birth Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA / PERINATOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Cervical Incompetence / Cerclage, Cervical / Premature Birth Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA / PERINATOLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States