Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prenatal reflex DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13.
Wald, Nicholas J; Huttly, Wayne J; Bestwick, Jonathan P; Old, Robert; Morris, Joan K; Cheng, Ray; Aquilina, Joe; Peregrine, Elisabeth; Roberts, Devender; Alfirevic, Zarko.
Affiliation
  • Wald NJ; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. n.j.wald@qmul.ac.uk.
  • Huttly WJ; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Bestwick JP; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Old R; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Morris JK; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Cheng R; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Aquilina J; Maternity Department, Barts Health NHS Trust (Royal London Hospital, Newham General Hospital and/Whipps Cross Hospitals), London, UK.
  • Peregrine E; Kingston Hospital Maternity service, London, UK.
  • Roberts D; Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Alfirevic Z; Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Genet Med ; 20(8): 825-830, 2018 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29120460
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the screening performance of prenatal reflex DNA screening for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18), and 13 (T13) as part of a routine service at five hospitals. METHODS: Women who accepted screening had a first-trimester combined test (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin, nuchal translucency interpreted with maternal age). Those with a risk of having an affected pregnancy ≥1 in 800 were reflexed to a DNA sequencing test using stored plasma from the original blood sample, thereby avoiding the need to recall them. RESULTS: Of 22,812 women screened (including 106 with affected pregnancies), 2,480 (10.9%) were reflexed to DNA testing; 101/106 were detected (69/73 T21, 24/25 T18, and 8/8 T13), a 95% detection rate (95% confidence interval 89-98%) with four false positives (0.02%, 95% confidence interval 0.00-0.05%). The odds of being affected given a positive result were 25:1. Of the 105 screen-positive pregnancies, 91 (87%) had an invasive diagnostic test. Reflex DNA screening avoided up to 530 invasive diagnostic tests compared with using the combined test. CONCLUSION: Reflex DNA screening was successfully implemented in routine care, achieving a high detection rate, low false-positive rate, and, consequently, greater safety with fewer invasive diagnostic tests than other methods of screening.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Diagnosis / Trisomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Diagnosis / Trisomy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Genet Med Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States