Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Derived Fick Cardiac Outputs in Patients with Heart Failure.
Tecson, Kristen M; Vasudevan, Anupama; Bindra, Amarinder; Joseph, Susan M; Felius, Joost; Hall, Shelley A; Kale, Parag.
Affiliation
  • Tecson KM; Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Vasudevan A; Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Bindra A; Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Joseph SM; Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Felius J; Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas.
  • Hall SA; Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Kale P; Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas; Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: Parag.Kale@bswhealth.org.
Am J Cardiol ; 121(1): 50-54, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29169604
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the gold standard to calculate Fick cardiac outputs (FCOs) in patients with heart failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) provides long-term intravenous access and is used outside the ICU; however, there is scant literature validating venous oxygen saturations (VOSs) from PICC lines. Heart failure patients in the ICU with an existing PAC requiring a PICC line to transition were enrolled. Three blood samples were taken per person (1 at PICC, 1 at central venous pressure [CVP], and 1 at distal PAC). We performed repeated measures analysis of variance, as well as reliability analysis on 31 subjects (77% male, 71% Caucasian, mean ± standard deviation age 60 ± 8 years, 80% on inotropes). The average VOSs were 62 ± 11%, 62 ± 12%, and 61 ± 9% for the PICC line, CVP, and distal port, respectively (p = 0.66); there was excellent reliability (0.79). The median FCOs were 5 [4, 6], 5 [4, 6], and 5 [4, 6] L/min at the PICC, CVP, and distal port, respectively (p = 0.91); there was fair-to-good reliability (0.67). In conclusion, VOS and FCO did not differ by location, on average. Reliable data may be obtained through the PICC line, after evaluation from the PAC. The PICC may provide longer-term hemodynamic assessment while improving patient comfort.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Catheterization, Peripheral / Cardiac Output / Central Venous Catheters / Heart Failure Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Catheterization, Peripheral / Cardiac Output / Central Venous Catheters / Heart Failure Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Cardiol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States