Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnification of digital hip radiographs differs between clinical workplaces.
Hornová, Jana; Ruzicka, Pavel; Hrubina, Maros; Stastný, Eduard; Kosková, Andrea; Fulín, Petr; Gallo, Jirí; Daniel, Matej.
Affiliation
  • Hornová J; Laboratory of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Ruzicka P; Laboratory of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Hrubina M; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Pelhrimov, Pelhrimov, Czech Republic.
  • Stastný E; Department of Paediatric and Adult Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Teaching Hospital Motol in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Kosková A; Department of Radiology, Hospital Jablonec nad Nisou, Jablonec nad Nisou, Czech Republic.
  • Fulín P; Department of Orthopaedic, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Teaching Hospital Motol in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Gallo J; Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Teaching Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Daniel M; Laboratory of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
PLoS One ; 12(11): e0188743, 2017.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29190787
ABSTRACT
Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty includes templating on anteroposterior radiographs. It is necessary to consider radiographic magnification in order to scale templates accurately. Studies dealing with hip templating report different values of radiographic magnification. It is not clear if the observed difference in magnification between the studies is caused by variability in studied groups, methodology or instrumentation. We hypothesize that there is a difference in magnification between clinical workplaces. Within this study, radiographic magnification was estimated on 337 radiographs of patients after total hip surgery from five orthopaedic departments in the Czech Republic. Magnification was determined for each patient as a ratio between diameter of implanted femoral head measured on radiogram and its true size. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in magnification between workplaces (F(4,332) = 132, p≤0.001). These results suggest that radiographic magnification depends on the workplace where it is taken or more precisely on radiographic device. It indicates potential limits in generalizability of results of studies dealing with preoperative planning accuracy to other institutions.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Czech Republic

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Czech Republic