[German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) position statement on endoscopic decompression in acute Ileus]. / Positionspapier der DGVS zur endoskopischen Dekompression bei akutem Ileus.

ABSTRACT

In patients with ileus with dilated intestine in imaging studies, endoscopic decompression appears a feasible option. However, its use is often uncritical and without scientific evidence. Before considering endoscopic intervention, CT-imaging should differentiate between mechanical obstruction and paralytic ileus/intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Tumor diagnosis and localisation are essential because the latter determines the choice of the decompression procedure. Coecal dilatation of more than 12 cm indicates an increased risk of perforation. In patients with toxic megacolon, dilation of the transverse colon to more than 6 cm is considered critical without much prospective evidence. Endoscopic decompression has a high complication rate and should be performed electively, and not as an emergency procedure, whenever possible. The use of CO2 insufflation rather than ambient air is strongly recommended, as is the availability of fluoroscopy. Prior trans-nasal or oral decompression-tube placement is routinely performed, and tracheobronchial intubation frequently required. In over 90 % of patients with pseudo-obstruction, conservative treatment is successful within 24 to 48 hours, and endoscopic decompression is, therefore, unnecessary. Placement of self-expanding metal stents to decompress a tumor stenosis is considered mostly for the left colon and rectum and burdened with significant risks of perforation and stent migration. Stent impact on oncological outcome is controversial because of possible tumor cell mobilization and increased postoperative cancer recurrence rates. Surgery, as primary intervention, achieves its objective in most cases. Decompression effect by endoscopic suctioning of gas and intestinal fluid is usually transient so that it is combined with transrectal decompression tubes insertion. This paper reviews the advantages and flaws of various decompression procedures in different clinical settings.