Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of lesser tuberosity osteotomy in revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.
Lopez, Cesar D; Maier, Stephen P; Bloom, Zachary J; Shiu, Brian B; Petkovic, Djuro; Jobin, Charles M.
Affiliation
  • Lopez CD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Maier SP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Bloom ZJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Shiu BB; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Petkovic D; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Jobin CM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jobin@columbia.edu.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(7): e219-e224, 2018 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396101
BACKGROUND: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is a common surgical approach during anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Outcomes of LTO have been shown to be similar to subscapularis tenotomy and peel techniques, but little is known about the outcomes of LTO during revision arthroplasty. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 10 consecutive patients who underwent LTO during revision shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution from 2012 to 2016. Patients underwent a preoperative computed tomography scan to evaluate the lesser tuberosity bone stock. Demographic information, radiographic evidence of LTO healing, outcomes of range of motion, subscapularis strength, and visual analog scale pain scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Revision total shoulder arthroplasty with LTO was performed for glenoid arthritis after hemiarthroplasty in 10 patients. Average age at surgery was 59.8 years, and no humeral stems were revised. Eight of 10 patients had prior subscapularis tenotomy. Average follow-up after revision surgery was 9.2 months. LTO union was documented in 80% and nondisplaced nonunion in 20%. At follow-up, 50% reported mild pain. Subscapularis strength testing was graded normal in 80% and weak in 20%. Average visual analog scale pain improved from 9.4 prerevision to 4.8 postrevision (P < .05). On average, range of motion improved in active forward elevation from 123° to 141° and remained unchanged in active external rotation from 42° to 42°. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing LTO during revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate successful LTO bony healing, improvement in pain, and improved forward elevation. In select patients not requiring humeral stem revision, LTO is a safe and effective surgical approach to subscapularis management during revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteotomy / Reoperation / Shoulder Joint / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder / Humerus Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Osteotomy / Reoperation / Shoulder Joint / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder / Humerus Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States