Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of a sodium fluoride- and phytate-containing dentifrice on remineralisation of enamel erosive lesions-an in situ randomised clinical study.
Creeth, Jonathan E; Parkinson, Charles R; Burnett, Gary R; Sanyal, Susmita; Lippert, Frank; Zero, Domenick T; Hara, Anderson T.
Affiliation
  • Creeth JE; GSK Consumer Healthcare, St George's Avenue, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0DE, UK. jonathan.e.creeth@gsk.com.
  • Parkinson CR; GSK Consumer Healthcare, St George's Avenue, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0DE, UK.
  • Burnett GR; GSK Consumer Healthcare, St George's Avenue, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0DE, UK.
  • Sanyal S; Syneos Health, Hyderabad, India.
  • Lippert F; Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Zero DT; Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Hara AT; Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(7): 2543-2552, 2018 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423713
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this work was to evaluate effects of a dentifrice containing sodium fluoride (1150 ppm F) and the organic polyphosphate phytate (0.85% w/w of the hexa-sodium salt) on in situ remineralisation of early enamel erosive lesions and resistance to subsequent demineralisation. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Subjects (n = 62) wore palatal appliances holding eight bovine enamel specimens with pre-formed erosive lesions. They brushed their natural teeth with the phytate test dentifrice (TD); a positive control dentifrice (PC, 1150 ppm fluoride as NaF); a reference dentifrice (RD, disodium pyrophosphate + 1100 ppm fluoride as NaF) or a negative control dentifrice (NC, fluoride-free) in a randomised, double-blind, crossover design. Specimens were removed at 2, 4 and 8 h post-brushing and exposed to an ex vivo acid challenge. Surface microhardness (Knoop) was measured at each stage. The primary efficacy variable was relative erosion resistance (RER); other variables included the surface microhardness recovery (SMHR), acid resistance ratio (ARR) and enamel fluoride uptake (EFU).

RESULTS:

After 4 h, the results for RER, ARR and EFU were in the order PC > TD = RD > NC with PC > TD = RD = NC for SMHR. Results at 2 and 8 h were generally consistent with the 4 h data. Mineralisation progressed over time. Dentifrices were generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this in situ model, addition of phytate or pyrophosphate to a fluoride dentifrice inhibited the remineralising effect of fluoride. Both formulations still delivered fluoride to the enamel and inhibited demineralisation, albeit to a lesser extent than a polyphosphate-free dentifrice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Addition of phytate or pyrophosphate to a fluoride dentifrice may reduce its net anti-erosive properties.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phytic Acid / Sodium Fluoride / Tooth Erosion / Tooth Remineralization / Dentifrices Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phytic Acid / Sodium Fluoride / Tooth Erosion / Tooth Remineralization / Dentifrices Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom