Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survey of the prevalence and methodology of quality assurance for B-mode ultrasound image quality among veterinary sonographers.
Hoscheit, Larry P; Heng, Hock Gan; Lim, Chee Kin; Weng, Hsin-Yi.
Affiliation
  • Hoscheit LP; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Heng HG; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Lim CK; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Weng HY; Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 59(3): 326-332, 2018 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29528172
Image quality in B-mode ultrasound is important as it reflects the diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic information provided during clinical scanning. Quality assurance programs for B-mode ultrasound systems/components are comprised of initial quality acceptance testing and subsequent regularly scheduled quality control testing. The importance of quality assurance programs for B-mode ultrasound image quality using ultrasound phantoms is well documented in the human medical and medical physics literature. The purpose of this prospective, cross-sectional, survey study was to determine the prevalence and methodology of quality acceptance testing and quality control testing of image quality for ultrasound system/components among veterinary sonographers. An online electronic survey was sent to 1497 members of veterinary imaging organizations: the American College of Veterinary Radiology, the Veterinary Ultrasound Society, and the European Association of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging, and a total of 167 responses were received. The results showed that the percentages of veterinary sonographers performing quality acceptance testing and quality control testing are 42% (64/151; 95% confidence interval 34-52%) and 26% (40/156: 95% confidence interval 19-33%) respectively. Of the respondents who claimed to have quality acceptance testing or quality control testing of image quality in place for their ultrasound system/components, 0% have performed quality acceptance testing or quality control testing correctly (quality acceptance testing 95% confidence interval: 0-6%, quality control testing 95% confidence interval: 0-11%). Further education and guidelines are recommended for veterinary sonographers in the area of quality acceptance testing and quality control testing for B-mode ultrasound equipment/components.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality Control / Ultrasonography / Animal Technicians Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / MEDICINA VETERINARIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality Control / Ultrasonography / Animal Technicians Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / MEDICINA VETERINARIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom