Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Endurance Training on The Lactate and Glucose Minimum Intensities.
Junior, Pedro B; de Andrade, Vitor L; Campos, Eduardo Z; Kalva-Filho, Carlos A; Zagatto, Alessandro M; de Araújo, Gustavo G; Papoti, Marcelo.
Affiliation
  • Junior PB; Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió/Alagoas, Brazil.
  • de Andrade VL; Biosciences Institute, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho", Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Campos EZ; Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife/Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Kalva-Filho CA; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Zagatto AM; School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Araújo GG; Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió/Alagoas, Brazil.
  • Papoti M; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Sports Sci Med ; 17(1): 117-123, 2018 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29535585
Due to the controversy about the sensitive of lactate minimum intensity (LMI) to training and the need to develop other tool for aerobic fitness evaluation, the purpose of this study was to analyze the sensitivity of glucose minimum intensity (GMI) and LMI to endurance training. Eight trained male cyclists (21.4 ± 1.9 years, 67.6 ± 7.5 kg and 1.72 ± 0.10 m) were evaluated twice, before and after 12 weeks of training. GMI and LMI were calculated, respectively, by the lowest blood glucose and lactate values attained during an incremental test performed after a hyperlactemia induction, and VO2max was determined during standard incremental effort. The training was prescribed in three different zones and controlled by heart rate (HR). The training distribution was equivalent to 59.7%, 25.0% and 15.3% below, at and above anaerobic threshold HR respectively. The anaerobic threshold evaluated by GMI and LMI improvement 9.89 ± 4.35% and 10.28 ± 9.89 respectively, after training, but the VO2max 2.52 ± 1.81%. No differences were found between GMI and LMI in pre (218.2 ± 22.1 vs 215.0 ± 18.6 W) and post (240.6 ± 22.9 vs 237.5 ± 18.8 W) training situations. LMI and GMI were sensitive to 12-week aerobic training in cyclist; thus, both protocols can be used to assess aerobic adaptation, athletes diagnostic and prescribe training.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Sports Sci Med Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Turkey

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: J Sports Sci Med Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: Turkey