Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of Size-Dependent Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT Angiography.
Boere, Hub; Eijsvoogel, Nienke G; Sailer, Anna M; Wildberger, Joachim E; de Haan, Michiel W; Das, Marco; Jeukens, Cecile R L P N.
Affiliation
  • Boere H; 1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Eijsvoogel NG; 1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Sailer AM; 2 CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Wildberger JE; 1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • de Haan MW; 3 Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
  • Das M; 1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Jeukens CRLPN; 2 CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 210(5): W226-W233, 2018 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570369
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are established for standard-sized patients; however, patient dose in CT depends on patient size. The purpose of this study was to introduce a method for setting size-dependent local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) and to evaluate these LDRLs in comparison with size-independent LDRLs and with respect to image quality. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

One hundred eighty-four aortic CT angiography (CTA) examinations performed on either a second-generation or third-generation dual-source CT scanner were included; we refer to the second-generation dual-source CT scanner as "CT1" and the third-generation dual-source CT scanner as "CT2." The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and patient diameter (i.e., the water-equivalent diameter) were retrieved by dose-monitoring software. Size-dependent DRLs based on a linear regression of the CTDIvol versus patient size were set by scanner type. Size-independent DRLs were set by the 5th and 95th percentiles of the CTDIvol values. Objective image quality was assessed using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale.

RESULTS:

The CTDIvol depended on patient size and scanner type (R2 = 0.72 and 0.78, respectively; slope = 0.05 and 0.02 mGy/mm; p < 0.001). Of the outliers identified by size-independent DRLs, 30% (CT1) and 67% (CT2) were adequately dosed when considering patient size. Alternatively, 30% (CT1) and 70% (CT2) of the outliers found with size-dependent DRLs were not identified using size-independent DRLs. A negative correlation was found between SNR and CTDIvol (R2 = 0.36 for CT1 and 0.45 for CT2). However, all outliers had a subjective image quality score of sufficient or better.

CONCLUSION:

We introduce a method for setting size-dependent LDRLs in CTA. Size-dependent LDRLs are relevant for assessing the appropriateness of the radiation dose for an individual patient on a specific CT scanner.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Diseases / Radiation Dosage / Body Size / Computed Tomography Angiography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Diseases / Radiation Dosage / Body Size / Computed Tomography Angiography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands