Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Asking a Variety of Questions on Walk Rounds: a Pilot Study.
Shields, Helen M; Pelletier, Stephen R; Roy, Christopher L; Honan, James P.
Affiliation
  • Shields HM; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. hmshields@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Pelletier SR; Division of Medical Communications, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. hmshields@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Roy CL; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Honan JP; Office of Educational Quality Improvement, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(6): 969-974, 2018 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29589174
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Morning walk rounds have lost some of their engagement while remaining a useful and valued practice.

AIM:

We created a pilot study to evaluate the impact on rounds of learning to asking a variety of different questions.

SETTING:

One-hour intervention sessions were voluntarily offered to members of the Department of Medicine and taught by an expert in the question, listen, and respond method.

PARTICIPANTS:

Participants included attendings and residents in Internal Medicine on medical teams. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Questionnaires were collected on six pre-intervention and six post-intervention days. Nine months later, an anonymous online survey was sent to participants asking about their use of a wider variety of questions. PROGRAM EVALUATION Two hundred eight physicians (residents 175 (45.5%), attending physicians 25 (27.7%)) filled out pre-intervention surveys. One hundred eighty-one physicians (residents 155 (40.3%), attending physicians 18 (20%)) filled out post-intervention surveys. When survey responses from the attendings and residents on the medical teams were combined, post-intervention rounds were perceived as more worthwhile (1.99 pre-intervention and 1.55 post-intervention, [95% confidence interval 1.831-2.143]) (p < 0.001) and more engaging (1.68 pre-intervention and 1.30 post-intervention, [95% confidence interval 1.407-1.688]) (p < 0.001).Non-medical teams' survey responses did not change. Patient census data indicated no significant difference in the hospital's census on the pre- and post-intervention dates. Spontaneous suggestions for improving rounds came largely from the residents and included teaching points, clinical pearls, patient focus, more interactive, increased dedicated time for teaching, inclusive/multidisciplinary, questions, and evidence-based teaching. Of the participants who answered the online survey 9 months later, 75% (6/8) reported that they "actually asked a wider variety of types of questions."

DISCUSSION:

This pilot study indicates that the 1-h intervention of learning to ask a variety of different questions is associated with rounds that are rated as more worthwhile and engaging by the medical teams.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Teaching Rounds / Simulation Training / Internship and Residency / Medical Staff, Hospital Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Gen Intern Med Journal subject: MEDICINA INTERNA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Teaching Rounds / Simulation Training / Internship and Residency / Medical Staff, Hospital Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Gen Intern Med Journal subject: MEDICINA INTERNA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States