Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer in men with a high risk of disease relapse.
Laing, Robert; Uribe, Jennifer; Uribe-Lewis, Santiago; Money-Kyrle, Julian; Perna, Carla; Chintzoglou, Stylianos; Khaksar, Sara; Langley, Stephen E M.
Affiliation
  • Laing R; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Uribe J; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Uribe-Lewis S; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Money-Kyrle J; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Perna C; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Chintzoglou S; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Khaksar S; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
  • Langley SEM; St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Guildford, UK.
BJU Int ; 122(4): 610-617, 2018 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29607601
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To report clinical outcomes of 125 I low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) as monotherapy or combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in high-risk localised prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Analysis of clinical outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients treated with LDR-PB alone or combined treatment in a single institution. Men with a high risk of disease relapse were identified by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria or by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and metastases-free survival (MFS), were analysed together with patient-reported symptom scores and physician-reported adverse events.

RESULTS:

The NICE and NCCN criteria identified 267 and 202 high-risk patients, respectively. NICE-defined patients had significantly lower pre-treatment PSA levels, Gleason scores <7, and a greater proportion of patients who received LDR-PB monotherapy. At 9 years after implantation RFS was 89% and 87% in the NICE and NCCN groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.637), and OS 93% and 94%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.481). All of the survival estimates were similar between LDR-PB monotherapy and combined therapies. Cox proportional hazards regression confirmed RFS was similar between the treatment types. Treatment-related toxicity was also similar between the treatment methods.

CONCLUSION:

LDR-PB is effective at controlling localised prostate cancer in patients with a high risk of disease relapse. As the present study was not randomised, it is not possible to define those patients who need the addition of ADT and/or EBRT. However, the NICE criteria appear suitable to define treatment options where patients could benefit from LDR-PB as monotherapy or combined treatment. This choice should be discussed with the patient taking into account comorbidities and presence of multiple high-risk factors.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Brachytherapy / Androgen Antagonists / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BJU Int Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Brachytherapy / Androgen Antagonists / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: BJU Int Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom