Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
European repository of explicit criteria of potentially inappropriate medications in old age.
Ivanova, Ivana; Elseviers, Monique; Wauters, Maarten; Christiaens, Thierry; Vander Stichele, Robert.
Affiliation
  • Ivanova I; Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Research Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Elseviers M; Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Research Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Wauters M; Center for Research and Innovation in Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Christiaens T; Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Research Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vander Stichele R; Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Research Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 18(8): 1293-1297, 2018 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29665270
AIM: Lack of electronic assessment of medication lists in electronic health records is a barrier for more generalized use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) lists, designed for older adults. The aim was to construct a European repository of explicit criteria on PIM, suitable for electronic assessment. METHODS: PIM description, medication information, clinical information and level of evidence was entered. Criteria with unclear medication specifications were excluded. Too complex criteria were divided for more operable use. RESULTS: We selected three lists: the European Union (7)-PIM (2015), STOPP/START (2014) and Beers criteria (2015). After exclusion and division, from 641 original criteria of the three PIM-lists, a total of 650 criteria were entered (n = 282 from European Union (7)-PIM, n = 201 from Beers and n = 167 from the STOPP/START list). Identification of the medication was possible with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System for practically all criteria, except for 23 (3.5%). From all criteria, 63.9% required only medication-related information. In 55.7% of the criteria, identification of the active substance(s) was the only medication data requirement and 8.2% required additional information (dose, duration, route of administration). From all criteria, 36.1% required clinical information, from which 17.8% requested disease information only, and 18.3% required additional information (indication, history of diseases, laboratory results or severity of diseases). CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to enter most of the original criteria of the three PIM lists into a repository of electronically applicable criteria. In the future, developers of new PIM lists should take into account semantic interoperability and consider the suitability of the criteria for electronic use. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1293-1297.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aging / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Inappropriate Prescribing / Potentially Inappropriate Medication List Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium Country of publication: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aging / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Inappropriate Prescribing / Potentially Inappropriate Medication List Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium Country of publication: Japan