Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of different resin cements and surface treatments on microshear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics.
Petrauskas, Anderson; Novaes Olivieri, Karina Andrea; Pupo, Yasmine Mendes; Berger, Guilherme; Gonçalves Betiol, Ederson Áureo.
Affiliation
  • Petrauskas A; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Novaes Olivieri KA; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Pupo YM; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Berger G; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Gonçalves Betiol EÁ; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
J Conserv Dent ; 21(2): 198-204, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29674825
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This study aims to evaluate the microshear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics with different resin cement systems and surface treatments. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Forty blocks of zirconia-based ceramic were prepared and embedded in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes with acrylic resin. After polishing, the samples were washed in an ultrasonic bath and dried in an oven for 10 min. Half of the samples were subjected to sandblasting with aluminum oxide. Blocks were divided into four groups (n = 10) in which two resin cements were used as follows (1) RelyX™ U100 with surface-polished zirconia; (2) RelyX™ U100 with surface-blasted zirconia; (3) Multilink with surface-polished zirconia; and 4) Multilink with surface-blasted zirconia. After performing these surface treatments, translucent tubes (n = 30 per group) were placed on the zirconia specimens, and resin cement was injected into them and light cured. The PVC tubes were adapted in a universal testing machine; a stiletto blade, which was bolted to the machine, was positioned on the cementation interface. The microshear test was performed at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure mode was analyzed in an optical microscope and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed.

RESULTS:

The null hypothesis of this study was rejected because there was a difference found between the resin cement and the surface treatment. There was a statistical difference (P < 0.005) in RelyX™ U100 with surface-blasted zirconia, in relation to the other three groups. For Multilink groups, there was no statistical difference between them.

CONCLUSION:

Self-adhesive resin cement showed a more significant tendency toward bond strength in the ceramic-based zirconium oxide grit-blasted surfaces.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Conserv Dent Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Conserv Dent Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil