Restraint prevalence and perceived coercion among psychiatric inpatients from South India: A prospective study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Indian Mental Health Care Act 2017 (MHCA -2017) advocates the duty to provide treatment in the least coercive manner. Little data exists on how Indian patients perceive coercion in medical settings. AIMS: To study the prevalence of restraint in a Indian psychiatric inpatient unit, and to examine the level of perceived coercion correlating to various forms of restraint. METHODOLOGY: This is a hospital based prospective observational study. Two hundred patients were recruited through computer generated random number sampling. In eligible subjects, demographic and clinical data, restraints used and assessments related to perceived coercion were completed within 3 days of admission. Perceived coercion was reassessed at the time or within 3 days before discharge. RESULTS: In 66.5% one or more restraint measures were used, physical restraints in 20%, chemical restraints in 58%, seclusion in 18%, and involuntary medication in 32%. ECT is associated with the lowest level of perceived coercion followed by isolation/seclusion, chemical restraint, involuntary medication and physical restraint. Male gender, being married, rural background, low socioeconomic status, having a mood disorder, and alcohol or drug dependence was associated with an increased risk of physical or chemical restraint. Having a mood disorder, being from a rural area and a lower socioeconomic status was associated with being subjected to more than one form of coercion. CONCLUSION: Restraint measures are more prevalent in psychiatric hospital care in India than in Europe. Physical restraint is particularly associted with higher perceived coercion.