Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled trial of MoodSwings 2.0: An internet-based self-management program for bipolar disorder.
Gliddon, Emma; Cosgrove, Victoria; Berk, Lesley; Lauder, Sue; Mohebbi, Mohammadreza; Grimm, David; Dodd, Seetal; Coulson, Carolyn; Raju, Karishma; Suppes, Trisha; Berk, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Gliddon E; IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Cosgrove V; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Berk L; Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Lauder S; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Mohebbi M; IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Grimm D; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Dodd S; School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Coulson C; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Raju K; Faculty of Health, School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.
  • Suppes T; IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  • Berk M; Deakin Biostatistics Unit, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Bipolar Disord ; 21(1): 28-39, 2019 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931798
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

MoodSwings 2.0 is an online self-guided intervention for bipolar disorder that includes educational modules, interactive tools, and discussion forums. The primary aim of the study was to determine if participation in MoodSwings 2.0 would result in decreased symptoms of depression and mania compared to the control condition. Secondary aims were to identify improvements in core depression symptoms, quality of life, medication adherence, functioning, and time to relapse.

METHODS:

This was a three-arm randomized controlled trial that compared two intervention arms against a peer support control group (forum). A total of 304 adults aged 21 to 65 years with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder were assigned to a forum-only control group (Group 1; n = 102), a forum plus modules treatment group (Group 2; n = 102), or a forum, modules, and tools treatment group (Group 3; n = 100), in addition to usual care.

RESULTS:

There was a significant intervention impact showing improvement on the primary outcome of depression for Group 2 compared to Group 1 (P = .05) with effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 0.17 to 0.43. There was also a significant intervention impact showing improvement on the secondary outcome of core depression for Group 2 (P = .02) and Group 3 (P = .05), but worse physical functioning for Group 3 (P = .01), compared to Group 1.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides evidence of the efficacy of internet-based psychoeducation interventions for bipolar disorder in reducing depressive symptoms. Further investigation is needed to assess effectiveness in a public program.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bipolar Disorder / Telemedicine / Internet / Self-Management Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Bipolar Disord Journal subject: PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bipolar Disorder / Telemedicine / Internet / Self-Management Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Bipolar Disord Journal subject: PSIQUIATRIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia