Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Future priorities of acute hospitals for surgical site infection surveillance in England.
Godbole, G; Wloch, C; Harrington, P; Verlander, N Q; Hopkins, S; Johnson, A P; Lamagni, T.
Affiliation
  • Godbole G; Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Wloch C; Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Harrington P; Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Verlander NQ; Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Hopkins S; Public Health Strategy, Health Protection and Medical Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Johnson AP; Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
  • Lamagni T; Department of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK. Electronic address: theresa.lamagni@phe.gov.uk.
J Hosp Infect ; 100(4): 371-377, 2018 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944900
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Since the launch of the national Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Surveillance Service in 1997, successive expansions of the programme provided hospitals with increasing flexibility in procedures to target through surveillance. Ensuring that the programme continues to meet hospitals' needs remains essential.

AIM:

As a means to inform the future direction of the service, a survey of all acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken to assess and understand priorities for surveillance.

METHODS:

A web-based survey was circulated to acute NHS trust infection control teams in England, asking them to identify and rank (i) reasons for undertaking current SSI surveillance, (ii) priority surgical categories for future SSI surveillance, and (iii) reasons for prioritizing these categories.

FINDINGS:

Of the 161 trusts surveyed, 84 (52%) responded. Assessment of quality of care was identified as the most common driver for SSI surveillance activity. Considerable heterogeneity in priority areas was observed, with 24 different surgical categories selected as top priority. Of the procedures undertaken by 15 or more trusts, caesarean section (2.7), hip replacement (2.8) and coronary artery bypass graft (2.9) were highest ranked. All 17 categories in the current surveillance programme were selected as a top priority by one or more trusts.

CONCLUSION:

Whereas the majority of hospitals' priorities for SSI surveillance are included in the current programme, the top-ranked priority, caesarean section, is not included. Given the diversity of priority areas, maintaining a comprehensive spectrum of categories in the national programme is essential to assist hospitals in addressing local priorities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Infection / Infection Control / Epidemiological Monitoring Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Wound Infection / Infection Control / Epidemiological Monitoring Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom
...