Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconsidering the Need for Reconsent at 18.
Berkman, Benjamin E; Howard, Dana; Wendler, David.
Affiliation
  • Berkman BE; Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and berkmanbe@mail.nih.gov.
  • Howard D; National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Wendler D; Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and.
Pediatrics ; 142(2)2018 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29980586
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of research with biological specimens has led to a debate over what type of consent is needed to obtain biological specimens from minors and store them for future studies. In most cases, parental permission is needed to obtain samples from minors. In addition, almost all commentators and guidelines maintain that researchers need the consent of the donors if they want to continue to store the samples and make them available for future studies after the donors reach the age of majority. In this Ethics Rounds, we argue that this near-consensus view is mistaken on the grounds that the agreement of the parents at the time of obtaining samples provides sufficient permission to store them and use them in research even after the donors turn 18 years old.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Specimen Banks / Parental Consent / Minors / Informed Consent Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Specimen Banks / Parental Consent / Minors / Informed Consent Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2018 Document type: Article