Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical usefulness of multiplex PCR-lateral flow for the diagnosis of orthopedic-related infections.
Minegishi, Yojiro; Uchiyama, Katsufumi; Sakurai, Keizo; Ibe, Shiro; Kanda, Hiromi; Nihonyanagi, Shin; Nakamura, Masaki; Ikeda, Shinsuke; Takaso, Masashi.
Affiliation
  • Minegishi Y; Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Uchiyama K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Sakurai K; Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Ibe S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Kanda H; Infection Control Team, Kitasato University Hospital , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Nihonyanagi S; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kitasato University Hospital , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Nakamura M; Kitasato-Otsuka Biomedical Assay Laboratories Co., Ltd , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Ikeda S; Kitasato-Otsuka Biomedical Assay Laboratories Co., Ltd , Sagamihara , Japan.
  • Takaso M; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kitasato University Hospital , Sagamihara , Japan.
Mod Rheumatol ; 29(5): 867-873, 2019 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126317
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays are being increasingly used for the diagnosis of orthopedic-related infections. Unfortunately, classical PCR requires imaging devices that are expensive and complex. We previously developed the PCR-lateral flow (PCR-LF) method, which does not require any additional imaging device. In the present study, the objective was to determine whether PCR-LF tests could be used to effectively diagnose orthopedic-related infections.

Methods:

In this study, we used PCR-LF to diagnose common causes of orthopedic-related infections and compared the results to those from conventional bacterial cultures of the same samples.

Results:

Notably, for 228 synovial fluid or pus specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of bacterial cultures were 53.5% and 97.7%, respectively, compared to 61.6% and 89.9% for PCR-LF. Although the difference in sensitivity between bacterial cultures and PCR-LF was not significant, when our analysis was limited to cases with suspected periprosthetic joint infection, the sensitivity of PCR-LF (66.1%) was superior to that of bacterial cultures (42.9%).

Conclusion:

This study indicates that PCR-LF is a useful method for diagnosing orthopedic-related infections.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Infectious / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Mod Rheumatol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Infectious / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Mod Rheumatol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan