Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alirocumab safety in people with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled data from 14 ODYSSEY trials.
Leiter, L A; Tinahones, F J; Karalis, D G; Bujas-Bobanovic, M; Letierce, A; Mandel, J; Samuel, R; Jones, P H.
Affiliation
  • Leiter LA; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Tinahones FJ; Department of Clinical Endocrinology and Nutrition (IBIMA), Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, University of Málaga, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain.
  • Karalis DG; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bujas-Bobanovic M; Sanofi, Paris, France.
  • Letierce A; Biostatistics and Programming Department, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
  • Mandel J; IviData Stats, Levallois Perret, France.
  • Samuel R; Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
  • Jones PH; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Diabet Med ; 35(12): 1742-1751, 2018 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183102
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor alirocumab according to diabetes mellitus status.

METHODS:

Safety data from 14 trials (8-104-week durations) were analysed by treatment (alirocumab or placebo/ezetimibe control) and diabetes status (yes/no, defined by medical history). Adverse event data were assessed using descriptive statistics and Cox models.

RESULTS:

Of the 5234 trial participants, 1554 (29.7%) had diabetes. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in the alirocumab and control groups, except for more frequent local injection site reactions with alirocumab. Fewer people with diabetes experienced local injection site reactions [alirocumab, 3.5%, control, 2.9%; hazard ratio 1.24 (95% CI 0.68-2.25)] than those without diabetes [alirocumab, 7.5%; control, 4.9%; hazard ratio 1.51 (95% CI 1.13-2.01)]. Those with diabetes reported a greater number of serious adverse events (alirocumab, 19.4%; control, 19.7%) than those without diabetes (alirocumab, 14.5%; control, 13.5%). In people with diabetes, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 2.7% of alirocumab-treated people [control, 3.3%; hazard ratio 0.74 (95% CI 0.41-1.35)]; in those without diabetes, 1.8% of alirocumab-treated people had major adverse cardiac events [control, 1.7%; hazard ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.56-1.62)]. Overall, no increase in HbA1c or fasting plasma glucose vs control treatment groups was observed, regardless of diabetes status.

CONCLUSION:

This pooled analysis across 14 trials demonstrated similar safety for alirocumab vs control treatment, irrespective of diabetes status, except for more frequent local injection site reactions with alirocumab. People with diabetes reported fewer local injection site reactions than those without diabetes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic / Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic / Diabetes Complications / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / Hypercholesterolemia / Antibodies, Monoclonal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic / Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic / Diabetes Complications / Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / Hypercholesterolemia / Antibodies, Monoclonal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada