Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanics of L5/S1 in Long Thoracolumbosacral Constructs: A Cadaveric Study.
Lee, Bryan S; Walsh, Kevin M; Healy, Andrew T; Colbrunn, Robb; Butler, Robert S; Goodwin, Ryan C; Steinmetz, Michael P; Mroz, Thomas E.
Affiliation
  • Lee BS; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Walsh KM; Bryan S. Lee and Kevin M. Walsh are co-first authors.
  • Healy AT; Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Colbrunn R; Bryan S. Lee and Kevin M. Walsh are co-first authors.
  • Butler RS; Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  • Goodwin RC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Steinmetz MP; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Mroz TE; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Global Spine J ; 8(6): 607-614, 2018 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30202715
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVES:

Despite numerous techniques employed to establish solid lumbosacral fixation, there are little biomechanical data correlating fixation methods at L5/S1 to thoracolumbosacral (TLS) construct length. We aimed to determine the optimal construct with the hypothesis that under physiological loads, lumbosacral constructs can be stabilized by L5/S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) alone, without iliac screw fixation (ISF), and that TLS constructs would require ISF, with or without ALIF.

METHODS:

By using a robot capable of motion in 6 axes, force-moment sensor, motion-tracking camera system and software, we simulated the spinal loading effects in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, and compared torques in different construct groups of T4-S1, T10-S1, and L2-S1. By conducting multidirectional flexibility testing we assessed the effects of constructs of various lengths on the L5/S1 segment.

RESULTS:

L2-S1 constructs may be equivalently stabilized by L5/S1 ALIF alone without ISF. Longer TLS constructs exerted increasing motion at L5/S1, exhibiting trends in favor of ISF when extending to T10 and statistically improved fixation when extending to T4. Lastly, TLS constructs with ISF exhibited a statistically significant reduction in L5-S1 range of motion from the addition of ALIF when extending to T4-pelvis but not T10-pelvis.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found that ALIF alone may sufficiently support the L2-S1 construct, reducing L5/S1 range of motion and transmitting loads instead to the sacropelvis. Furthermore, ALIF was found to add significant stability to the T4-pelvis construct when added to ISF. This difference was not significant for the T10-pelvis construct.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Global Spine J Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Global Spine J Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States