Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of a fluorescent marker with quantitative bioburden methods to assess cleanliness.
Hung, I-Chen; Chang, Hao-Yuan; Cheng, Aristine; Chen, An-Chi; Ting, Ling; Chen, Mei-Wen; Lai, Yeur-Hur; Sheng, Wang-Huei.
Affiliation
  • Hung IC; 1Center for Infection Control,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Chang HY; 2School of Nursing,National Taiwan University,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Cheng A; 3Department of Internal Medicine,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Chen AC; 1Center for Infection Control,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Ting L; 1Center for Infection Control,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Chen MW; 4Department of Nursing,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Lai YH; 2School of Nursing,National Taiwan University,Taipei,Taiwan.
  • Sheng WH; 1Center for Infection Control,National Taiwan University Hospital,Taipei,Taiwan.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(11): 1296-1300, 2018 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221609
BACKGROUND: Improvement of environmental cleaning in hospitals has been shown to decrease in-hospital cross transmission of pathogens. Several objective methods, including aerobic colony counts (ACCs), the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay, and the fluorescent marker method have been developed to assess cleanliness. However, the standard interpretation of cleanliness using the fluorescent marker method remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the fluorescent marker method as a tool for determining the effectiveness of hospital cleaning. DESIGN: A prospective survey study. SETTING: An academic medical center. METHODS: The same 10 high-touch surfaces were tested after each terminal cleaning using (1) the fluorescent marker method, (2) the ATP assay, and (3) the ACC method. Using the fluorescent marker method under study, surfaces were classified as totally clean, partially clean, or not clean. The ACC method was used as the standard for comparison. RESULTS: According to the fluorescent marker method, of the 830 high-touch surfaces, 321 surfaces (38.7%) were totally clean (TC group), 84 surfaces (10.1%) were partially clean (PC group), and 425 surfaces (51.2%) were not clean (NC group). The TC group had significantly lower ATP and ACC values (mean ± SD, 428.7 ± 1,180.0 relative light units [RLU] and 15.6 ± 77.3 colony forming units [CFU]/100 cm2) than the PC group (1,386.8 ± 2,434.0 RLU and 34.9 ± 87.2 CFU/100 cm2) and the NC group (1,132.9 ± 2,976.1 RLU and 46.8 ± 119.2 CFU/100 cm2). CONCLUSIONS: The fluorescent marker method provided a simple, reliable, and real-time assessment of environmental cleaning in hospitals. Our results indicate that only a surface determined to be totally clean using the fluorescent marker method could be considered clean.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sanitation / Infection Control / Housekeeping, Hospital Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sanitation / Infection Control / Housekeeping, Hospital Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United States