Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia Treatment Outcomes After Nerve Section, Microvascular Decompression, or Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lu, Victor M; Goyal, Anshit; Graffeo, Christopher S; Perry, Avital; Jonker, Benjamin P; Link, Michael J.
Affiliation
  • Lu VM; Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: z5134616@unsw.edu.au.
  • Goyal A; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Graffeo CS; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Perry A; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Jonker BP; Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Link MJ; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
World Neurosurg ; 120: 572-582.e7, 2018 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30240868
BACKGROUND: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare neuralgic pain syndrome amenable to neurosurgical treatments, including nerve section (NS), microvascular decompression (MVD), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, thorough comparisons of the modalities have not been performed to date. The objective of the present study was to compare the pain and complication outcomes after these approaches to GPN. METHODS: Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to June 2018 were conducted following the appropriate guidelines. The incidence rates (IRs) of short-term (≤3 months) and long-term (≥12 months) pain relief and complications were extracted and analyzed using a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 792 GPN cases managed by NS, MVD, or SRS were described by 6, 11, and 6 studies, reporting outcomes for 282 (36%), 446 (56%), and 67 (8%) cases. The short-term pain relief rate was highest after NS postoperatively (IR, 94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-98%) and lowest after SRS at 3 months postoperatively (IR, 80%; 95% CI, 68%-96%). The postoperative complication rate was greatest after MVD (IR, 26%; 95% CI, 16%-38%) and lowest after SRS (IR, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-4%). The long-term pain relief rate was greatest after NS (IR, 96%; 95% CI, 91%-99%) and lowest after SRS (IR, 82%; 95% CI, 67%-94%). Statistically significant differences between the approaches were found for each outcome. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical treatment of GPN is frequently performed by 1 of 3 modalities with unique outcomes profiles. NS might provide the most favorable treatment response, with respect to short- and long-term pain relief and postoperative outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiosurgery / Neurosurgical Procedures / Glossopharyngeal Nerve Diseases / Microvascular Decompression Surgery / Glossopharyngeal Nerve Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World Neurosurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiosurgery / Neurosurgical Procedures / Glossopharyngeal Nerve Diseases / Microvascular Decompression Surgery / Glossopharyngeal Nerve Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World Neurosurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States