Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Device updates successfully reduce T­wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks in subcutaneous ICD patients.
Larbig, R; Motloch, L J; Bettin, M; Fischer, A; Bode, N; Frommeyer, G; Loeher, A; Koebe, J; Reinke, F; Eckardt, L.
Affiliation
  • Larbig R; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. Robert.Larbig@gmx.de.
  • Motloch LJ; Department of Internal Medicine II, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Bettin M; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Fischer A; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Bode N; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Frommeyer G; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Loeher A; Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Koebe J; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Reinke F; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
  • Eckardt L; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Neth Heart J ; 26(12): 606-611, 2018 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30250998
AIMS: To analyse the impact of device and software updates on the prevention of T­wave oversensing (TWOS) and inappropriate shocks (IS) in subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) patients. BACKGROUND: TWOS is a feared complication after implantation. It may lead to harmful IS. To date, specific strategies to reduce these events are lacking. METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre trial we analysed 146 S­ICD patients who were implanted between 2010 and 2016. In all eligible consecutive patients (n = 139), follow-up of at least 6 weeks was studied. The incidence of TWOS/IS was analysed in patients receiving a 2nd generation S­ICD (Emblem-S-ICD) between 2014 and 2016 (Emblem). Their outcome was compared with a control group (SQ) treated with the SQ1010 device between 2010 and 2014, who were followed up for a maximum of 2 years. Furthermore, to test if the software update SMR8 reduces inappropriate shocks in the SQ1010-S-ICD population, the incidence of TWOS/IS was evaluated before and after update installation. RESULTS: Basic characteristics and indications for S­ICD implantation were similar in both groups. However, the cumulative incidence of TWOS/IS was significantly decreased in Emblem vs. SQ (SQ: 15.4%, n = 14/91 vs. Emblem 4.2%, n = 2/48; p = 0.049). Furthermore, with regards to the SQ population we also observed a trend towards a significant reduction of TWOS/IS after installation of the software update SMR8 in 2014 (before update: 13.4%, n = 11/82 vs. after update: 4.6%, 3/65, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: 2nd generation devices but probably also the SMR8 software update reduce the incidence of TWOS/IS in S­ICD patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neth Heart J Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neth Heart J Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Germany Country of publication: Netherlands