Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-learning of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound - Can medical students teach themselves?
Fuchs, Lior; Gilad, David; Mizrakli, Yuval; Sadeh, Re'em; Galante, Ori; Kobal, Sergio.
Affiliation
  • Fuchs L; Joyce and Irwing Goldman Medical School, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Gilad D; Medical Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center and The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Mizrakli Y; Joyce and Irwing Goldman Medical School, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Sadeh R; Joyce and Irwing Goldman Medical School, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Galante O; Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center and The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Kobal S; Joyce and Irwing Goldman Medical School, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
PLoS One ; 13(9): e0204087, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30260977
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) is a rapidly evolving discipline that aims to train non-cardiologists, non-radiologists clinicians in performing bedside ultrasound to guide clinical decision. Training of PoCUS is challenging, time-consuming and requires large amount of resources. The objective of our study was to evaluate if this training process can be simplified by allowing medical students self-train themselves with a web-based cardiac ultrasound software. METHODS: A prospective, single blinded, cohort study, comparing performance of 29 medical students in performing a six-minutes cardiac ultrasound exam. Students were divided into two groups: self-learning group, using a combination of E-learning software and self-practice using pocket ultrasound device compared to formal, frontal cardiac ultrasound course. RESULTS: All 29 students completed their designated courses and performed the six-minutes exam: 20 students participated in the frontal cardiac ultrasound course and 9 completed the self-learning course. The median (Q1,Q3) test score for the self-learning group was higher than the frontal course group score, 18 (15,19) versus 15 (12,19.5), respectively. Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was found between the two study groups (p = 0.478). All students in the self-learning course group (9/9, 100%) and 16 (16/20, 80%) of students in the frontal ultrasound course group obtained correct alignment of the parasternal long axis view (p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Self-learning students combining E-learning software with self-practice cardiac ultrasound were as good as students who received a validated, bedside, frontal cardiac ultrasound course. Our findings suggest that independent cardiac ultrasound learning, combining utilization of E-learning software and self-practice, is feasible. Self-E- learning of cardiac ultrasound may serve as an important, cost-effective adjunct to heavily resource consuming traditional teaching.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Echocardiography / Point-of-Care Systems / Learning Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Echocardiography / Point-of-Care Systems / Learning Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Country of publication: United States