Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.
Panchal, Ripul; Denhaese, Ryan; Hill, Clint; Strenge, K Brandon; DE Moura, Alexandre; Passias, Peter; Arnold, Paul; Cappuccino, Andrew; Dennis, M David; Kranenburg, Andy; Ventimiglia, Brieta; Martin, Kim; Ferry, Chris; Martineck, Sarah; Moore, Camille; Kim, Kee.
Affiliation
  • Panchal R; University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
  • Denhaese R; AXIS Neurosurgery and Spine, Williamsville, New York.
  • Hill C; The Orthopaedic Institute, Paducah, Kentucky.
  • Strenge KB; The Orthopaedic Institute, Paducah, Kentucky.
  • DE Moura A; New York Spine Institute, Westbury, New York.
  • Passias P; New York Spine Institute, Westbury, New York.
  • Arnold P; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Cappuccino A; Buffalo Spine Surgery, Lockport, New York.
  • Dennis MD; South Texas Spinal Clinic, Laredo, Texas.
  • Kranenburg A; Southern Oregon Orthopaedics, Medford, Oregon.
  • Ventimiglia B; Zimmer Biomet Spine, Broomfield, Colorado.
  • Martin K; Zimmer Biomet Spine, Broomfield, Colorado.
  • Ferry C; Zimmer Biomet Spine, Broomfield, Colorado.
  • Martineck S; RPA Consulting, Grand Island, New York.
  • Moore C; University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, Colorado.
  • Kim K; University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
Int J Spine Surg ; 12(2): 172-184, 2018 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276077
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rigid interspinous process fixation (ISPF) has received consideration as an efficient, minimally disruptive technique in supporting lumbar interbody fusion. However, despite advantageous intraoperative utility, limited evidence exists characterizing midterm to long-term clinical outcomes with ISPF. The objective of this multicenter study was to prospectively assess patients receiving single-level anterior (ALIF) or lateral (LLIF) lumbar interbody fusion with adjunctive ISPF.

METHODS:

This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter (11 investigators), noninferiority trial. All patients received single-level ALIF or LLIF with supplemental ISPF (n = 66) or pedicle screw fixation (PSF; n = 37) for degenerative disc disease and/or spondylolisthesis (grade ≤2). The randomization patient ratio was 21, ISPF/PSF. Perioperative and follow-up outcomes were collected (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).

RESULTS:

For ISPF patients, mean posterior intraoperative outcomes were blood loss, 70.9 mL; operating time, 52.2 minutes; incision length, 5.5 cm; and fluoroscopic imaging time, 10.4 seconds. Statistically significant improvement in patient Oswestry Disability Index scores were achieved by just 6 weeks after operation (P < .01) and improved out to 12 months for the ISPF cohort. Patient-reported 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 12 months in the ISPF cohort (P < .01). A total of 92.7% of ISPF patients exhibited interspinous fusion at 12 months. One ISPF patient (1.5%) required a secondary surgical intervention of possible relation to the posterior instrumentation/procedure.

CONCLUSION:

ISPF can be achieved quickly, with minimal tissue disruption and complication. In supplementing ALIF and LLIF, ISPF supported significant improvement in early postoperative (≤12 months) patient-reported outcomes, while facilitating robust posterior fusion.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Int J Spine Surg Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: Int J Spine Surg Year: 2018 Document type: Article