Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intersubject specific absorption rate variability analysis through construction of 23 realistic body models for prostate imaging at 7T.
Meliadò, Ettore F; van den Berg, Cornelis A T; Luijten, Peter R; Raaijmakers, Alexander J E.
Affiliation
  • Meliadò EF; Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berg CAT; MR Code BV, Zaltbommel, The Netherlands.
  • Luijten PR; Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Raaijmakers AJE; Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med ; 81(3): 2106-2119, 2019 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414210
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

For ultrahigh field (UHF) MRI, the expected local specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution is usually calculated by numerical simulations using a limited number of generic body models and adding a safety margin to take into account intersubject variability. Assessment of this variability with a large model database would be desirable. In this study, a procedure to create such a database with accurate subject-specific models is presented. Using 23 models, intersubject variability is investigated for prostate imaging at 7T with an 8-channel fractionated dipole antenna array with 16 receive loops.

METHOD:

From Dixon images of a volunteer acquired at 1.5T with a mockup array in place, an accurate dielectric model is built. Following this procedure, 23 subject-specific models for local SAR assessment at 7T were created enabling an extensive analysis of the intersubject B1+ and peak local SAR variability.

RESULTS:

For the investigated setup, the maximum possible peak local SAR ranges from 2.6 to 4.6 W/kg for 8 × 1 W input power. The expected peak local SAR values represent a Gaussian distribution (µ/σ=2.29/0.29 W/kg) with realistic prostate-shimmed phase settings and a gamma distribution Γ(24,0.09) with multidimensional radiofrequency pulses. Prostate-shimmed phase settings are similar for all models. Using 1 generic phase setting, average B1+ reduction is 7%. Using only 1 model, the required safety margin for intersubject variability is 1.6 to 1.8.

CONCLUSION:

The presented procedure allows for the creation of a customized model database. The results provide valuable insights into B1+ and local SAR variability. Recommended power thresholds per channel are 3.1 W with phase shimming on prostate or 2.6 W for multidimensional pulses.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Phantoms, Imaging Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Phantoms, Imaging Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA